“Is that the blue you’re using?”

Six words. Delivered flat. No need to finish the sentence — the sentence has already done its work. Not your job. Not your dignity. Not even your tenuous grasp of reality.

Eve Babitz catalogued it as a weapon, which is the correct taxonomy. Not criticism. Not feedback. A small, precise act of demolition disguised as curiosity. The genius of it — and it is a kind of genius — is that it leaves no fingerprints. The asker was only asking. You’re the one who collapsed.

I’ve collapsed. More than once. And I’ve been doing this for thirty years.

That’s the thing nobody tells you about experience. You imagine it arriving as certainty — that one day the room stops being a room you have to read and becomes one you simply occupy. That the doubt calcifies into confidence. That you stop feeling the question land.

It doesn’t work like that.

What experience actually delivers is a more precise map of your own instability. You learn where the soft ground is. You recognise the exact moment the doubt begins to move. You understand, with uncomfortable clarity, exactly what you’re about to do — and then, more often than not, you do it anyway.

Thirty years in, I don’t know more than I did. I know what I don’t know. That’s a different thing entirely, and considerably less comforting.

The room is always the same room. The work is on the screen or the wall or the table and for a moment — just before they see it — I still believe in it completely. That moment is the only clean one. Then the eyes land. The slight adjustment of posture. The pause that lasts exactly one beat too long.

Is that the blue you’re using?

And something in me — something three decades of practice has failed to train out — starts to move. Not toward defence. Toward processing. I begin to talk. Not to persuade them. To think. To locate myself inside the work again through the act of explaining it, to rebuild the conviction out loud that should have been structural to begin with.

I know I’m doing it while I’m doing it. That’s what experience gave me — the self-awareness to watch myself make the mistake in real time.

It’s a strange gift.

I’ve spent a long time trying to understand the difference between defending work and explaining it. They look similar from the outside. From the inside they feel completely different — defending is what you do when you’ve already lost the ground, explaining is what you do when you never needed to hold it in the first place.

→ Read the full article on Medium